Notes
-
Slack is the degree of freedom (free time, for instance) required to effect change.
- If you have to do something new, you can only do it effectively if you have some degree of freedom.
- If you don't have free time and must do something, you'll have to stop what you're doing, thus being ineffective because of context switching.
-
"Slack is the natural enemy of efficiency and efficiency is the natural enemy of slack." Defined by Tom DeMarco.
- Efficiency, in this case, means you have all resources allocated, for example, all people working 100% of their time.
- If you want to keep everyone busy, you must allow some buffering.
-
Slack can be perceived as negative in an environment of manic efficiency. It can be seen as laziness or lack of initiative.
-
Slack can reduce efficiency, but it can increase effectiveness. If you have an excess of time, for instance, you have time to think about the long-term priorities and check if you're on the right trajectory instead of just doing operational tasks.
-
It allows us to respond to changing circumstances and experiment more.
-
Too much slack is bad because resources get wasted and people get bored.
- But the absence of slack is a bigger problem than an excess of it.
Questions
- Do lack of slack for a long period of time cause burnout?